Humza Yousaf: Anti-sectarianism bill is robust & deserves support
EVERYBODY remembers the first football match they were taken to.
Be it in the 1950s or just last week, there is no greater excitement than when you are taken to watch your team play for the first time.
For me, it was the 1995 Scottish Cup fourth-round tie between Celtic and Raith Rovers.

My uncle, a lifelong Celtic fan, had decided that at the age of 10, I was finally ready.
I'll never forget the experience; the sounds, the tastes, the fans, the atmosphere, the singing, and of course the match itself (Celtic won 2-0).
None of us want to see that atmosphere and passion leave football. It is what makes the beautiful game the world's most popular sport.
There has been a lot of misunderstanding and misinformation regarding the Scottish government's proposed legislation on tackling offensive behaviour at football.
It is safe to say 95 per cent or more of football fans have absolutely nothing to worry about.
The overwhelming majority of those who watch their team do so to watch football. They sing to urge their team towards victory not to incite public disorder.
Unfortunately, there is a minority who believe they have a right to take part in behaviour that threatens the very reputation of our national game.
It is clear that legislation should never be made in haste and therefore it was important that the Scottish government reconsidered their original plans and extended the timetable for consultation.
As a result, we have a robust piece of legislation.
A freedom of expression clause is included to ensure that vital rights are protected.
A review clause has also been inserted so that after two football seasons. we can pull the legislation back in if we feel the need to do so.
Even when this legislation does pass, it is vital that the police and authorities work with fans and clubs.
After a meeting with the police, Hearts FC put a note on their website urging fans to behave appropriately at last weekend's match against Celtic.
The result? Everyone has been talking about the match and not any illicit chanting or behaviour.
For their part, the police have a duty not to be heavy-handed or unnecessarily invasive with recording equipment.
It is clear we cannot have a repeat of last season's parcel bombs, bullets in the post and death threats.
This bill will help ensure people are talking about the football and not the type of behaviour that damaged our reputation.
We are rightly proud of our national game. Let's not allow a vocal minority to ruin it for us all.
Older/Newer
« Gordon Matheson: Glasgow City Council committed to keeping elderly warm in winter | Jim Murphy: World events of 2011 will have an impact on Glasgow communities »
0 TrackBacks
Listed below are links to blogs that reference this entry: Humza Yousaf: Anti-sectarianism bill is robust & deserves support.
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blogs.theglaswegian.co.uk/cgi-bin/mt425/mt-tb.cgi/148382


From the article - "It is clear we cannot have a repeat of last season's parcel bombs, bullets in the post and death threats."
I am astonished to learn that there was no legislation in place to outlaw parcel bombs, bullets in the post and death threats before the introduction of the Offensive Behaviour Bill.